Screener
NLR vs HAP
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.11% less per year.
- NLR is significantly larger than HAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NLR covers north america markets; HAP covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, NLR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| NLR | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.1B | $316M |
| Since | 2007 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.19% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.1% | +46.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +36.9% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.5% | +11.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.97% | 14.90% |
| Max drawdown | -34.35% | -44.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NLR and HAP
Explore further