Screener
NRES vs PBD
Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF vs Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- NRES costs 0.30% less per year.
- PBD is significantly larger than NRES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NRES is classified as alternative, while PBD is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- NRES follows a multi strategy strategy; PBD uses index tracking.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NRES | PBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $208M |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.23% | 1.74% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.8% | +95.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.72% | 23.36% |
| Max drawdown | -22.22% | -75.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NRES and PBD
Explore further