Screener
PBD vs PBW
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- PBW costs 0.11% less per year.
- PBD covers global markets; PBW covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $447M |
| Since | 2007 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 0.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.3% | +150.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.1% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | -8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.23% | 40.29% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -89.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and PBW
Explore further