Screener
NRES vs REMX
Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF vs VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
Key differences
- NRES costs 0.08% less per year.
- REMX is significantly larger than NRES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NRES is classified as alternative, while REMX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- NRES follows a multi strategy strategy; REMX uses index tracking.
- REMX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NRES | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.53% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2024 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.23% | 1.25% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.8% | +165.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.72% | 47.82% |
| Max drawdown | -22.22% | -73.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NRES and REMX
Explore further