Screener
REMX vs TURF
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF vs T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- TURF costs 0.09% less per year.
- REMX is significantly larger than TURF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- REMX follows a index tracking strategy; TURF uses active selection.
- REMX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REMX | TURF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.53% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.0B | $117M |
| Since | 2010 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.25% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +165.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 47.82% | — |
| Max drawdown | -73.34% | -6.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REMX and TURF
Explore further