Screener
NZAC vs ACWI
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF vs iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
Key differences
- NZAC costs 0.20% less per year.
- ACWI is significantly larger than NZAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ACWI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ACWI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NZAC | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $188M | $31.3B |
| Since | 2014 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.83% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.7% | +29.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.3% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.95% | 12.84% |
| Max drawdown | -33.72% | -33.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NZAC and ACWI
Explore further