Screener
NZAC vs ACWX
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF vs iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
Key differences
- NZAC costs 0.20% less per year.
- ACWX is significantly larger than NZAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACWX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NZAC | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $188M | $11.1B |
| Since | 2014 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.83% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.7% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.3% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.95% | 15.42% |
| Max drawdown | -33.72% | -35.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NZAC and ACWX
Explore further