Screener
NZAC vs CRBN
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF vs iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF
Key differences
- NZAC costs 0.08% less per year.
- CRBN is significantly larger than NZAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CRBN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| NZAC | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $188M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2014 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.83% | 2.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.7% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.3% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +11.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.95% | 13.09% |
| Max drawdown | -33.72% | -33.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NZAC and CRBN
Explore further