Screener
OASC vs ACSV
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF vs American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF
Key differences
- ACSV costs 0.20% less per year.
- OASC is significantly larger than ACSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OASC follows a index tracking strategy; ACSV uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| OASC | ACSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $12M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | — |
| Max drawdown | -26.99% | -7.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OASC and ACSV
Explore further