Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

OBOR vs EEM

KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

OBOR

KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF

KraneShares

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$4M

EEM

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.72%

Fund size

$28.1B

Key differences

  • EEM costs 0.07% less per year.
  • EEM is significantly larger than OBOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, EEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

OBOREEM
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.72%
Fund size (AUM)$4M$28.1B
Since20172003
Dividend yield1.84%1.91%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+21.6%+46.1%
CAGR 3Y+10.2%+21.9%
CAGR 5Y+1.3%+7.0%
Sharpe 3Y0.481.00
Volatility 1Y15.67%19.54%
Max drawdown-39.86%-39.82%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to OBOR and EEM