Screener
OBOR vs KEMX
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF vs KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
Key differences
- KEMX costs 0.55% less per year.
- KEMX is significantly larger than OBOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OBOR | KEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $118M |
| Since | 2017 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.84% | 2.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.3% | +74.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | +29.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.4% | +14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.50 | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.01% | 22.26% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -38.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OBOR and KEMX
Explore further