Screener
OEF vs KAUG
iShares S&P 100 ETF vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - August
Key differences
- OEF costs 0.59% less per year.
- OEF is significantly larger than KAUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OEF is classified as equity, while KAUG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- OEF follows a index tracking strategy; KAUG uses structured outcome.
- OEF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OEF | KAUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19.6B | $80M |
| Since | 2000 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.9% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.88% | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -31.44% | -15.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OEF and KAUG
Explore further