Screener
OEF vs RWL
iShares S&P 100 ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- OEF costs 0.19% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, OEF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- OEF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OEF | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19.6B | $8.8B |
| Since | 2000 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.9% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.8% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.9% | +12.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.88% | 10.14% |
| Max drawdown | -31.44% | -36.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OEF and RWL
Explore further