Screener
RWL vs XOEF
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF
Key differences
- XOEF costs 0.19% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than XOEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWL | XOEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.8B | $20M |
| Since | 2008 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.14% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.04% | -7.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWL and XOEF
Explore further