Screener
OEFA vs DNL
ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF vs WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Growth Fund
Key differences
- DNL costs 0.06% less per year.
- DNL is significantly larger than OEFA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DNL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OEFA | DNL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.42% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $467M |
| Since | 2015 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 2.01% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.5% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.2% | +9.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | +4.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.48 | 0.43 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.04% | 17.90% |
| Max drawdown | -33.01% | -34.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OEFA and DNL
Explore further