Screener
OEFA vs HDV
ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF vs iShares Core High Dividend ETF
Key differences
- HDV costs 0.40% less per year.
- HDV is significantly larger than OEFA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, HDV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OEFA | HDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $13.6B |
| Since | 2015 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.01% | 2.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.4% | +25.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.03% | 9.59% |
| Max drawdown | -33.01% | -37.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OEFA and HDV
Explore further