Screener
OIH vs LFEQ
VanEck Oil Services ETF vs VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
Key differences
- OIH costs 0.23% less per year.
- OIH is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OIH is classified as equity, while LFEQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- OIH follows a index tracking strategy; LFEQ uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, OIH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- OIH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OIH | LFEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $29M |
| Since | 2011 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.09% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +100.2% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.9% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.6% | +10.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.55% | 12.11% |
| Max drawdown | -89.61% | -35.19% |
Similar to OIH and LFEQ
Explore further