Screener
OMFL vs MKAM
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Mkam Etf
Key differences
Both OMFL and MKAM are alternative ETFs. OMFL charges 0.29% a year and MKAM 0.53%. The main difference: OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; MKAM uses active selection.
- OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; MKAM uses active selection.
- OMFL costs 0.24% less per year.
- OMFL is much larger than MKAM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, OMFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- OMFL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFL | MKAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.53% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.7B | $13M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | 2.90% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.2% | +11.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +9.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.38% | 6.24% |
| Max drawdown | -33.24% | -5.01% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.