Screener
OMFL vs IMFL
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- OMFL costs 0.05% less per year.
- OMFL is significantly larger than IMFL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OMFL is classified as alternative, while IMFL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- OMFL covers north america markets; IMFL covers global.
- OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; IMFL uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IMFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFL | IMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.6B | $957M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | 3.02% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.5% | +32.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.3% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.4% | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 15.75% |
| Max drawdown | -33.24% | -33.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFL and IMFL
Explore further