Screener
OMFL vs QVMS
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF
Key differences
- QVMS costs 0.14% less per year.
- OMFL is significantly larger than QVMS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OMFL is classified as alternative, while QVMS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; QVMS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, QVMS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFL | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.6B | $232M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | 1.15% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.5% | +32.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.3% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 17.73% |
| Max drawdown | -33.24% | -28.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFL and QVMS
Explore further