Screener
QVMS vs OMFS
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- QVMS costs 0.24% less per year.
- QVMS follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVMS | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $232M | $275M |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.15% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.8% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.73% | 17.63% |
| Max drawdown | -28.05% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QVMS and OMFS
Explore further