Screener
OMFL vs RSP
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Key differences
- RSP costs 0.09% less per year.
- RSP is significantly larger than OMFL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OMFL is classified as alternative, while RSP is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; RSP uses index enhanced.
- RSP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFL | RSP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.6B | $86.4B |
| Since | 2017 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | 1.53% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.5% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.3% | +15.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.4% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 11.73% |
| Max drawdown | -33.24% | -39.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFL and RSP
Explore further