Screener
OMFL vs EQWL
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
Key differences
- OMFL is classified as alternative, while EQWL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; EQWL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EQWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EQWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFL | EQWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.6B | $2.5B |
| Since | 2017 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | 1.60% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.5% | +23.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.3% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.4% | +11.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 10.50% |
| Max drawdown | -33.24% | -34.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFL and EQWL
Explore further