Skip to content
Screener

OMFS vs DFAX

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF

OMFS

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$283M

DFAX

Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF

Annual cost

0.28%

Fund size

$12.1B

Key differences

Both OMFS and DFAX are equity ETFs. OMFS charges 0.39% a year and DFAX 0.28%. The main difference: OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; DFAX uses active selection.

  • OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; DFAX uses active selection.
  • OMFS covers North America; DFAX covers global markets excluding the US.
  • DFAX costs 0.11% less per year.
  • DFAX is much larger than OMFS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, DFAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • DFAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

OMFSDFAX
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.28%
Fund size (AUM)$283M$12.1B
Since20172008
Dividend yield0.90%2.21%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americaglobal ex us
Strategyindex enhancedactive selection
CAGR 1Y+31.4%+31.7%
CAGR 3Y+14.1%+20.8%
CAGR 5Y+5.9%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.571.10
Volatility 1Y18.00%15.74%
Max drawdown-42.50%-28.15%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to OMFS and DFAX