Skip to content
Screener

OMFS vs IWX

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF

OMFS

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$283M

IWX

iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$3.5B

Key differences

Both OMFS and IWX are equity ETFs. OMFS charges 0.39% a year and IWX 0.20%. The main difference: OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; IWX uses index tracking.

  • OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; IWX uses index tracking.
  • IWX costs 0.19% less per year.
  • IWX is much larger than OMFS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, IWX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IWX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

OMFSIWX
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.20%
Fund size (AUM)$283M$3.5B
Since20172009
Dividend yield0.90%1.49%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex enhancedindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+31.4%+29.3%
CAGR 3Y+14.1%+19.1%
CAGR 5Y+5.9%+11.4%
Sharpe 3Y0.571.21
Volatility 1Y18.00%10.45%
Max drawdown-42.50%-35.76%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to OMFS and IWX