Screener
See all growth funds
OMFS vs IWX
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
Key differences
Both OMFS and IWX are equity ETFs. OMFS charges 0.39% a year and IWX 0.20%. The main difference: OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; IWX uses index tracking.
- OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; IWX uses index tracking.
- IWX costs 0.19% less per year.
- IWX is much larger than OMFS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFS | IWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $283M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2017 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.4% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | +11.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.00% | 10.45% |
| Max drawdown | -42.50% | -35.76% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.