Screener
See all growth funds
OMFS vs IWD
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Key differences
Both OMFS and IWD are equity ETFs. OMFS charges 0.39% a year and IWD 0.18%. The main difference: OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; IWD uses index tracking.
- OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; IWD uses index tracking.
- IWD costs 0.21% less per year.
- IWD is much larger than OMFS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFS | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $283M | $75.6B |
| Since | 2017 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 1.50% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.4% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.00% | 11.18% |
| Max drawdown | -42.50% | -38.51% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.