Skip to content
Screener

OMFS vs IWD

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

OMFS

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$283M

IWD

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

Annual cost

0.18%

Fund size

$75.6B

Key differences

Both OMFS and IWD are equity ETFs. OMFS charges 0.39% a year and IWD 0.18%. The main difference: OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; IWD uses index tracking.

  • OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; IWD uses index tracking.
  • IWD costs 0.21% less per year.
  • IWD is much larger than OMFS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, IWD has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IWD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

OMFSIWD
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.18%
Fund size (AUM)$283M$75.6B
Since20172000
Dividend yield0.90%1.50%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex enhancedindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+31.4%+28.8%
CAGR 3Y+14.1%+18.4%
CAGR 5Y+5.9%+10.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.571.09
Volatility 1Y18.00%11.18%
Max drawdown-42.50%-38.51%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to OMFS and IWD