Screener
OMFS vs IWN
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
Both OMFS and IWN are equity ETFs. OMFS charges 0.39% a year and IWN 0.24%. The main difference: OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; IWN uses index tracking.
- OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; IWN uses index tracking.
- IWN costs 0.15% less per year.
- IWN is much larger than OMFS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFS | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $283M | $14.0B |
| Since | 2017 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.4% | +41.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.00% | 18.09% |
| Max drawdown | -42.50% | -46.08% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.