Screener
OMFS vs QVML
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
Key differences
- QVML costs 0.28% less per year.
- QVML is significantly larger than OMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; QVML uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, QVML has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFS | QVML | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.11% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $275M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 1.04% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.6% | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.4% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.63% | 11.85% |
| Max drawdown | -42.50% | -23.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFS and QVML
Explore further