Screener
OMFS vs QVMS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF
Key differences
- QVMS costs 0.24% less per year.
- OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; QVMS uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFS | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $275M | $232M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 1.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.6% | +32.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.4% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.63% | 17.73% |
| Max drawdown | -42.50% | -28.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFS and QVMS
Explore further