Screener
QVML vs OMFL
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF vs Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- QVML costs 0.18% less per year.
- QVML is classified as equity, while OMFL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- QVML follows a index tracking strategy; OMFL uses systematic alpha.
- Over the last 3 years, QVML has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVML | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.11% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $4.6B |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.04% | 0.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.85% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -23.52% | -33.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QVML and OMFL
Explore further