Screener
QVMS vs OMFL
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF vs Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- QVMS costs 0.14% less per year.
- OMFL is significantly larger than QVMS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QVMS is classified as equity, while OMFL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- QVMS follows a index tracking strategy; OMFL uses systematic alpha.
- Over the last 3 years, QVMS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVMS | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $232M | $4.6B |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.15% | 0.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.8% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.73% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -28.05% | -33.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QVMS and OMFL
Explore further