Screener
ONEO vs RSMV
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF vs Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF
Key differences
- ONEO costs 0.75% less per year.
- ONEO follows a index tracking strategy; RSMV uses active selection.
- ONEO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ONEO | RSMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27M | $29M |
| Since | 2015 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.22% | 0.99% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.1% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.91% | 11.84% |
| Max drawdown | -40.86% | -17.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ONEO and RSMV
Explore further