Screener
ONOF vs XRLX
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF vs FundX Conservative ETF
Key differences
- ONOF costs 0.81% less per year.
- XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ONOF | XRLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 1.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $148M | $51M |
| Since | 2021 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 1.35% | 2.68% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.8% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.78 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.43% | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -26.21% | -15.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ONOF and XRLX
Explore further