Screener
OPTZ vs BIBL
Optimize Strategy Index ETF vs Inspire 100 ETF
Key differences
- OPTZ costs 0.10% less per year.
- BIBL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OPTZ | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $436M |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.50% | 1.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +59.6% | +39.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.13% | 15.49% |
| Max drawdown | -25.75% | -36.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OPTZ and BIBL
Explore further