Screener
OSEA vs EMES
Harbor International Compounders ETF vs Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF
Key differences
- OSEA costs 0.10% less per year.
- OSEA is significantly larger than EMES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| OSEA | EMES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $497M | $11M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.3% | +39.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.30 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.18% | 20.51% |
| Max drawdown | -18.14% | -12.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OSEA and EMES
Explore further