Screener
OUSA vs RFFC
ALPS O'Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF Shares vs ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- OUSA is significantly larger than RFFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OUSA follows a index tracking strategy; RFFC uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RFFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OUSA | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $751M | $29M |
| Since | 2015 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.43% | 0.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.0% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.6% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.1% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.87% | 12.11% |
| Max drawdown | -33.12% | -36.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OUSA and RFFC
Explore further