Screener
RFFC vs OEFA
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF
Key differences
- RFFC follows a active selection strategy; OEFA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RFFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | OEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $37M |
| Since | 2016 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 2.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 16.03% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -33.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and OEFA
Explore further