Screener
OUSM vs DFVX
ALPS O'Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF Shares vs Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF
Key differences
- DFVX costs 0.29% less per year.
- OUSM follows a index tracking strategy; DFVX uses active selection.
- OUSM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OUSM | DFVX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $904M | $486M |
| Since | 2016 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.96% | 1.20% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.4% | +26.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.33% | 10.94% |
| Max drawdown | -39.84% | -16.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OUSM and DFVX
Explore further