Screener
PAVE vs IFRA
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF vs iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IFRA costs 0.17% less per year.
- PAVE is significantly larger than IFRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PAVE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PAVE | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $4.1B |
| Since | 2017 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +30.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.2% | +20.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.2% | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.75% | 14.79% |
| Max drawdown | -44.08% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PAVE and IFRA
Explore further