Screener
PBD vs ACES
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs ALPS Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ACES costs 0.20% less per year.
- PBD covers global markets; ACES covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, PBD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | ACES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $127M |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 0.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.3% | +55.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.1% | -2.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | -8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 0.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.23% | 32.30% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -79.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and ACES
Explore further