Screener
PBD vs AQWA
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Global X Clean Water ETF
Key differences
- AQWA costs 0.25% less per year.
- PBD is significantly larger than AQWA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, AQWA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | AQWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $26M |
| Since | 2007 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.3% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.1% | +9.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.23% | 14.38% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -29.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and AQWA
Explore further