Screener
PBD vs DMXF
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF
Key differences
- DMXF costs 0.63% less per year.
- DMXF is significantly larger than PBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, DMXF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | DMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $992M |
| Since | 2007 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 4.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.3% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.1% | +14.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +7.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.23% | 16.16% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -34.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and DMXF
Explore further