Screener
PBD vs EFRA
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF
Key differences
- EFRA costs 0.28% less per year.
- PBD is significantly larger than EFRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EFRA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | EFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $6M |
| Since | 2007 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.4% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +11.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.57 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.36% | 14.03% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and EFRA
Explore further