Screener
PBD vs EMCR
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF
Key differences
- EMCR costs 0.60% less per year.
- PBD is significantly larger than EMCR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PBD covers global markets; EMCR covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EMCR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | EMCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $54M |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 2.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.3% | +41.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.1% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.23% | 19.22% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -34.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and EMCR
Explore further