Screener
PBD vs MTRA
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco International Growth Focus ETF
Key differences
- MTRA costs 0.21% less per year.
- PBD follows a index tracking strategy; MTRA uses active selection.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | MTRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $142M |
| Since | 2007 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.36% | — |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -15.77% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and MTRA
Explore further