Screener
PBD vs QQMG
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
Key differences
- QQMG costs 0.55% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, QQMG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | QQMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $187M |
| Since | 2007 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 0.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.3% | +42.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.1% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.23% | 16.91% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -35.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and QQMG
Explore further