Screener
PBD vs QQQM
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Key differences
- QQQM costs 0.60% less per year.
- QQQM is significantly larger than PBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PBD covers global markets; QQQM covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, QQQM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $82.9B |
| Since | 2007 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.3% | +40.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.1% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +18.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.23% | 16.01% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -35.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and QQQM
Explore further