Screener
PBD vs TAN
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco Solar ETF
Key differences
- TAN costs 0.05% less per year.
- TAN is significantly larger than PBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PBD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2007 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.3% | +94.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.1% | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | -1.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 0.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.23% | 37.40% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -78.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and TAN
Explore further