Screener
PBW vs EINC
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs VanEck Energy Income ETF
Key differences
- EINC costs 0.18% less per year.
- PBW is significantly larger than EINC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EINC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBW | EINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $447M | $147M |
| Since | 2005 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.71% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +150.5% | +36.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +32.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.6% | +23.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 1.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.29% | 14.17% |
| Max drawdown | -89.06% | -68.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBW and EINC
Explore further