Screener
PBW vs ICLN
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.25% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than PBW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PBW covers north america markets; ICLN covers global.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBW | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $447M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2005 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.71% | 1.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +150.5% | +78.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.6% | +2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.29% | 25.99% |
| Max drawdown | -89.06% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBW and ICLN
Explore further